-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
github investigate sample #727
Conversation
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ import { YAMLStringify } from "./yaml" | |||
export function renderShellOutput(output: ShellOutput) { | |||
// Destructure the output object to retrieve exitCode, stdout, and stderr. | |||
const { exitCode, stdout, stderr } = output | |||
if (exitCode === 0) return stdout |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You have not handled the case when the exitCode is not 0. This could lead to unexpected behavior if the shell command fails. Please consider adding error handling for this case. 😊
generated by pr-review-commit
missing_error_handling
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ import { YAMLStringify } from "./yaml" | |||
export function renderShellOutput(output: ShellOutput) { | |||
// Destructure the output object to retrieve exitCode, stdout, and stderr. | |||
const { exitCode, stdout, stderr } = output | |||
if (exitCode === 0) return stdout |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are returning stdout when the exitCode is 0, but you are not using stderr in any way. If the shell command generates an error, this information will be lost. Consider including stderr in your output. 😊
generated by pr-review-commit
missing_stderr_handling
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ import { YAMLStringify } from "./yaml" | |||
export function renderShellOutput(output: ShellOutput) { | |||
// Destructure the output object to retrieve exitCode, stdout, and stderr. | |||
const { exitCode, stdout, stderr } = output | |||
if (exitCode === 0) return stdout |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the case where the exitCode is not 0, there is no explicit return statement. This could lead to undefined behavior. Please ensure all code paths return a value. 😊
generated by pr-review-commit
missing_return
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ import { YAMLStringify } from "./yaml" | |||
export function renderShellOutput(output: ShellOutput) { | |||
// Destructure the output object to retrieve exitCode, stdout, and stderr. | |||
const { exitCode, stdout, stderr } = output | |||
if (exitCode === 0) return stdout |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The early return when exitCode
is 0 might bypass important logic in the lines following this condition. Please ensure that no necessary code is being skipped due to this early return. 🧐
generated by pr-review-commit
early_return
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ import { YAMLStringify } from "./yaml" | |||
export function renderShellOutput(output: ShellOutput) { | |||
// Destructure the output object to retrieve exitCode, stdout, and stderr. | |||
const { exitCode, stdout, stderr } = output | |||
if (exitCode === 0) return stdout |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The function renderShellOutput
does not have a return type. Although TypeScript can infer the return type, it's a good practice to explicitly define it for better readability and maintainability. Please consider adding a return type to this function. 👍
generated by pr-review-commit
missing_return_type
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ | |||
"cross-fetch": "^4.0.0", | |||
"csv-parse": "^5.5.6", | |||
"csv-stringify": "^6.5.1", | |||
"diff": "^7.0.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is atest comment
"diff": "^7.0.0", | |
"diff": "^7.0.x", |
Investigator reportSummary of the Root CauseThe logs indicate TypeScript compilation errors in the file Suggested FixesHere's a diff with the proposed corrections: diff --git a/packages/sample/genaisrc/gai.genai.mts b/packages/sample/genaisrc/gai.genai.mts
index eeaa3417..f1b2c8d9 100644
--- a/packages/sample/genaisrc/gai.genai.mts
+++ b/packages/sample/genaisrc/gai.genai.mts
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ async function listRuns(workflow_id: string) {
}
async function downloadRunLog(run_id: number) {
-async function downloadR unLog(run_id: number) {
+async function downloadRunLog(run_id: number) {
const res = []
// Get the jobs for the specified workflow run
const { Explanation
|
@@ -424,37 +427,39 @@ export async function runScript( | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
let ghInfo: GithubConnectionInfo = undefined |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Initializing ghInfo
and adoInfo
to undefined
is unnecessary as variables in TypeScript are undefined
by default. You can simply declare them without initialization. 😊
generated by pr-review-commit
undefined_initialization
await githubCreatePullRequestReviews( | ||
script, | ||
info, | ||
ghInfo, | ||
result.annotations | ||
) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The nullish coalescing operator ??
is unnecessary when assigning ghInfo
because ghInfo
is already checked for undefined
in the if condition. You can directly use ghInfo = await githubParseEnv(process.env)
.
generated by pr-review-commit
unnecessary_nullish_coalescing
📦 Some new dependencies have been added to the
core
andsample
packages. These include thediff
library incore
and theoctokit
library insample
. This suggests that new functionality related to comparisons (potential code diff) and GitHub operations is being added.💻 A new script titled 'gh-action-investigator.genai.mts' has been created in the
sample
package. This script appears to use Octokit (GitHub API client) and the 'diff' module, possibly to investigate or compare GitHub action runs, specifically looking at the last successful run and the first failed run. From the script, it appears that it fetches the run logs, generates a diff of the logs, and potentially helps in identifying the cause of the failure.🕵️ This script uses the host's exec function to execute git commands, fetch diffs between commits, and download action logs from GitHub. This suggest that the script may be part of some CI/CD pipeline tools or local debugging tools to help diagnose issues with GitHub Action runs.
💥 The new script also includes error handling to catch scenarios where the repo information cannot be parsed from the remote URL, which is a thoughtful addition for robustness.
📝 The script defines a couple of internal helper functions that interact with GitHub's API via Octokit to get repository information, list workflow runs, and download run logs. This suggests a clearer separation of concerns and better code organization.
Remember, these are just high-level summaries and the actual intent and detailed functionality can only be understood by inspecting the code in a more detailed manner.